SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
J. Wagner, et al. - Clemson University, Department of Geological Sciences
Based on several graduate courses for teachers which we have taught at Clemson over the past several years, the single greatest professional development need appears to be in the area of earth science content. Many earth science teachers are teaching out of field and only have minimal exposure to earth science themselves. Many never even had a single earth science course in college. Such teachers may have extensive training in pedagogy and professional leadership, but are put in positions where they have to teach material they do not understand very well. As a result the students are shortchanged. For many of the new and innovative pedagogical practices to work, teachers must be knowledgeable about the material they are to teach. Over the past few years, we have noticed the state of South Carolina emphasizing non-content based professional development activities at almost every level. While we acknowledge that many of these programs are useful, we argue that until earth science teachers are brought up-to-speed on the content they are teaching, such programs will not produce the desired results.
There are many standards-based, proven curriculum programs currently in existence which lend themselves very well to professional development opportunities that will not only give teachers experience working with earth science content, but will also provide exemplary materials for these teachers to take into their classrooms and share with their students. Field based professional development activities are also encouraged because they provide teachers with first hand knowledge and hands-on experience with geological processes in action. Hands-on experience with rocks and minerals, fossils, soil samples, weather instruments, telescopes, topographic and weather maps, satellite images and aerial photographs, seismographs, and environmental problems will also aid the teacher in providing more inquiry-based lessons for their students.
K-12 Review Team 1, Kitty Farnell, School District Five
of Lexington & Richland Counties
1) Provide workshops with naturalists (like Rudy Mancke) and field biologists
(like Dr. Joe Culin) that help teachers understand relationships in nature.
2) Field studies to Barrier Island, SC or Skidaway Island, GA, or Earthshine,
NC.
3) Co-teaching with a master teacher and their own students with hands-on
activities.
4) Demonstration lessons with a master teacher using students to work with
while teacher participants observe.
5) Teachers sharing "activities that work".
6) Attending state, regional, and national science teachers' association
conventions.
7) Workshops on specific science topics conducted by experts to show how
to simplify concepts without making them wrong and with hands-on activities
that are teacher and student "friendly".
8) Meteorologist for weather activities.
9) Workshop on integration of science with language arts, math, and social
studies.
10) Workshops on aligning curriculum to match standards.
11) Workshops on constructivists techniques in the science lab.
12) Workshops on how to integrate technology with the Science Standards.
This should include use of Internet, TV/PC connectors, software to save
websites and use in class, Powerpoint presentations, CD Writer, scanner
to import diagrams, tables, graphs, etc. in student worksheets and tests,
digital camera with hands-on opportunities to learn, not just demos.
13) Provide a curriculum coordinator at each elementary school.
14) Conduct summer institutes with compensation for teachers to work with
master teachers partnering with college professors to identify, modify,
and/or develop core lab activities to match the standards and sample test
items to match them.
15) Workshops on lab activities in a certain grade to experience before
teaching.
16) SC MAPS Workshops.
17) Grade 8 topic workshops: Paleontology with absolute and relative dating;
Astronomy, Environmental Issues.
18) Workshops for high school teachers on (1) difficult topics like gene
regulation, respiration, etc., (2) connecting topics such as evolution,
genetics, (3) using process skills and inquiry techniques in labs, (4) constructivist
techniques, (5) use of technology such as CBLs and graphing calculators
for collecting and analyzing data with statistical techniques; (6) ways
of teaching concepts instead of only specifics (7) lab techniques (making
solutions, microscale, and using equipment); (8) Identifying core labs aligned
with standards (8) teachers sharing strategies with each other and tests,
worksheets, demo ideas, and labs.
K-12 Review Team 2, Lorraine Conrad, Richland School District
Two
1) Review materials available and provide a list of materials that meet
the standards. Indicate which objectives the materials will meet. For instance,
if there are four units of study at third grade, a list of materials to
meet each unit would be listed and any objective not met would be noted.
2) Provide training for teachers in materials that meet the standards. Training
should include content background as well as methods.
3) Provide training for pre-service professors in materials that meet the
standards so they can teach the pre-service teachers.
4) Provide training for teachers in how to write open-ended response items
to prepare our students for the PACT test.
5) Fund follow-up Great Expectations type grants so K-16 will continue to
discuss the continuum of science.
6) Fund projects that show how science can be integrated with other subjects
(K-5) and meet the standards. Show how parts of science instruction fit
within the Cunningham Model for reading instruction. Elementary teachers
cannot teach all the isolated standards within the school day.
7) Fund projects that give high school teachers opportunities to share methods
to meet standards. Provide institutes for teachers so they do not have further
than one hour to drive. Many of our teachers can not leave their families
at night so we need to plan for their staff development with that in mind.
K-12 Review Team 3, Colette Dryden, Satchel Ford Elementary
School
1) Pre-service teachers need more science content offered that is practical
to the teacher. (How to plan lesson, obtain materials, set up class). This
should be done by in-service teachers
not professors. We suggest
you hire recognized, outstanding teachers to teach college level students
regarding these matters. Undergraduates need more hands-on experiences as
well as the "how-to" of developing hands-on lessons. It would
be beneficial for pre-service teachers in the elementary program to work
with a confident science teacher in a school as a science practicuum. This
should be done as an additional requirement in the Science for Elementary
Teachers class.
2) In-Service teachers need access to resources. More courses should be
made available to teach principles and content behind hands-on lessons.
We suggest the courses should be done in the same manner as the Center for
Science Education uses in graduate courses. The instructors model the learning
cycle in their lessons. These courses should be subject specific (rocks
& minerals, weather, etc.).
Comments submitted individually:
Maritom Sinquefield Hardy, Science Lab Teacher
Laurens Primary School
301 Henry Street
Laurens, SC 29360
As an Elementary Science Lab teacher and Science Resource Person (at
Laurens Primary - Pre-K through the Second Grades - Including Montessori
and Traditional Classroom Styles) from the Upper Savannah Science and Math
Hub of Lander University (Curriculum Lead Teacher #4), I would like to make
a few suggestions that would help in implementing the integration of the
Science Standards for grades Pre-K to 3.
The teachers that I work with come to me truly afraid that they don't know
enough to teach their students effectively. Because of this I am available
to see if they need any assistance with their units related to science.
I try to let them see how every subject that they teach can be integrated
through "hands on" science activities.
I hope these suggestions help a little. It would surely help me if we could get just a few of these ideas running. Thanks for giving me a chance to voice my opinions.
(1) If teachers could have "mini workshops" throughout the
year or during the initial inservice training using their (what ever they
teach) long term curriculum and the Science Standards... they could see
how easily that their curriculum could be integrated into a more meaningful
learning process. To think using the science processes would be a means
to reach all of the different levels of "higher" learning. Trained
CLI's, like myself, could work within their own school or in others across
the state showing their peers how to integrate science into the Language
Arts and Mathematic programs using the latest methods.
(2) "Peer Observations" throughout the year in different districts
where Science is being implemented through the integration into the total
curriculum would be very positive for all students in education, as well
as teachers in the field. Reading about how science is taught may be all
right for some, but seeing it put into practice is the "clincher"!
Teachers could be paid for the time and expense of travel outside of their
classroom with substitutes filling in for them as they observe teachers
implementing their programs across the state. Again, I would be very selective
in where these teachers or students do their observation. Using the Hubs
in the state would be my first criteria of selecting Master teachers to
observe. The Hubs (like the Upper Savannah Science and Math Hub at Lander)
have trained teachers to use their curriculum to be integrated into all
of the areas of learning.
(3) "Resources" are always a must in any Science Lab. However,
if the teacher doesn't know where to begin purchasing their resources, it
can become a problem in itself. Roper Mountain Science Center (Science Plus
Institute from Furman University), Erskine College (Elementary Science Leadership
Program from Clemson University and the CPU courses from Erskine), Clemson
University (Great Expectations and Butterfly Project) and our district's
Adair Outdoor Education Center have been my "keys" through a successful
selection of materials. They have funded through our district's help courses
that not only provided hands on training, but also the monies or material
for the supplies needed to instruct effectively.
(4) "Grants" have helped me in the past, but with so many applying
for grants, it becomes harder and harder to expect monies or materials from
grants. If schools that have science labs had packages allotted for their
programs to spend on a yearly bases... then teachers could spend the time
that they have doing the other two suggestions. It's time consuming and
frustrating to try to develop meaningful programs without knowing if you
have the funding available for your programs. It usually comes out of one's
own pocket when the time get's short.
(5) "Share-A-Thons" are wonderful! However, paper to print out
ideas become expensive. The use of the Internet would be a great solution
to this problem. And to have "Free" use to the Internet would
be a bonus for teachers. However, economics doesn't help the second part
of this suggestion. Topics like "YOUR LONG RANGE LESSON PLANS RELATED
TO THE STANDARDS" could be shared. Teachers always need new and exciting
ideas that work. Teachers feel pressed for time when it comes to ADEPT,
etc. There are about 5 teachers that I write to almost daily on the Internet,
not to mention college professors like Joe Culin, for ideas on how to put
a particular idea into something workable for my students. Teaching over
222 second graders can become "mind-boggling" when one begins
a school year in a Science Lab situation.
(6) Funding for After School and Before School Programs. Not only is one
time consumed from these programs, but one's energy and finances. To arrange
presenters or to travel to locations to learn about different concepts you
take monies again from your own pocket to cover the expenses. We have programs
that attract students from Pre-K to the second grade. After they leave my
school they go to another elementary school (Grades 3 through 4) that have
just begun having similar programs which I helped to initiate... The students
meet and work on projects around the school and learn how to care for their
environment. The Mad Scientists and the Cicada Clubs have been recognized
nationally through the DHEC Program "Champions of the Environment"
and the Renew America Internet. The Cicada Club won for me the recognition
of being the 1996 Primary Teacher of the Year from the National Entomological
Society. So things can become more than one ever expected from working with
children during your time off.
Participants in the Review Process of the 1998 SC Science Standards
Steering Committee
Joseph D. Culin, Project Coordinator
Department of Entomology
Clemson University
Clemson, SC 29634-0365
John R. Wagner, Associate Professor
Department of Geological Sciences
Clemson University
Clemson, SC 29634-1908
Project Meeting Participants, July 1998
K-12
Conrad, Lorraine
Richland District Two
6831 Brookfield Rd.
Columbia, SC29206
Coke, Carol
PO Box 117
Six Mile, SC 29682
Phone 868-5472 (Home)
Edge, Ronald
University of South Carolina
Columbia, SC 29208
Farmer, Michael
Greenville Technical College
PO Box 5616
Pleasantburg Drive
Greenville, SC 29606
King, Peter
Francis Marion University
Department of Biology
PO Box 100547
Florence,SC 29501
Roop, Tom
Francis Marion University
Biology Department
PO Box 100547
Florence, SC 29501
Slone, J. Henry
Francis Marion University
Department of Biology
PO Box 100547
Florence, SC 29501-0547
Industry Representatives
Hipps, Michelle
Kemit Electronics
PO Box 5928
Greenville, SC 29606
Phone 864-963-6746
(note: Ms. Hipps is no longer at Kemit)
Jaskwhich, Mike
Chemurgy
PO Box 3977
Greenville, SC 29608
Phone 864-232-7697
Higher Education Reviewers
Dr. Mary Crowe
Assistant Professor of Biology
Coastal Carolina University
P.O. Box 261954
Conway, South Carolina 29528-6054
Dr. Sharon L. Gilman
Center for Marine and Wetland Studies
Coastal Carolina University
P.O. Box 261954
Conway, South Carolina 29528-6054
David P. Hildreth, Ph.D.
Department of Biology & Department of Education
Francis Marion University
PO Box 100547
Florence, SC 29501
Dr. Peter King
Department of Biology
Francis Marion University
PO Box 100547
Florence, SC 29501
Dr. Henry Slone
Francis Marion University
Department of Biology
PO Box 100547
Florence, SC 29501-0547
Dr. Jerry A. Waldvogel
Biology Instruction & Agricultural Education
Box 341902
Clemson University
Clemson, SC 29634-1902
Julia Wilcox
Senior Instructor of Biology
Coastal Carolina University
PO Box 261954
Conway, South Carolina 29528-6054
John R. Wagner
Department of Geological Sciences
Clemson University
Clemson, SC 29634-1908
Erik R. Caldwell, Visiting Instructor
Department of Geological Sciences
Clemson University
Clemson, SC 29634-1908
Joseph L. Tinsley
Department of Geological Sciences
Clemson University
Clemson, SC 29634-1908
Team Members
Dr. Lyn Long Assistant Principal, Chapin Elementary School
Joy Haynie 1st grade, River Springs Elementary School
Joye Rush 2nd grade, Irmo Elementary School
Easter Dickerson 2nd grade, Dutch Fork Elementary School
Kathy Lee 3rd grade, River Springs Elementary School
Martha Talbert 3rd grade, Lake Murray Elementary School
Lisa Garcia 4th grade, River Springs Elementary School
Bette Seastrunk 5th grade, Nursery Road Elementary School
Susan Swails 5th grade, Seven Oaks Elementary School
Jean Cook 5th grade, Nursery Road Elementary School
Paulette Moses 5th grade, River Springs Elementary School
Bonita Guram 6th grade, Chapin Middle School
Mary Barbara Kleckley 6th grade, CrossRoads Middle School
Jeanne McKinney 7th grade, Dutch Fork Middle School
Theresa Morris 7th grade, Chapin Middle School
Debbie Goldston 8th grade, Chapin Middle School
Susan Mazur 7 & 8th grade, Dutch Fork Middle School
Al Gates Biology, Dutch Fork High School
Erin Dickert Biology, Irmo High School
Dr. Glenda George Biology, Irmo High School
Karen Stratton Chemistry/Physics, Dutch Fork High School
Elizabeth Ann Sutton Physics, Dutch Fork High School
Homepage